Nevada Sen. Ensign opposing Kagan for Supreme Court
by Associated Press
Jul 23, 2010 | 366 views | 3 3 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
RENO — Citing a lack of support for the U.S. military and “demonstrated hostility” toward gun rights, Sen. John Ensign said Friday he will vote against the confirmation of Elena Kagan to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Ensign, R-Nev., singled out Kagan’s decision as dean of Harvard Law School to bar military recruiters from the campus career services office because of the ban on openly gay service members.

“This dishonored the military at a time when our servicemen and women were laying down their lives in defense of our country,” he said in a statement from Washington.

“Even more troubling was that Ms. Kagan expressed unfamiliarity with the intent of our Founding Fathers when they drafted the Second Amendment, especially given her past work and advocacy to undercut this fundamental individual right,” he said.

Ensign said he was impressed with the solicitor general’s “intellect and accomplishments” when he met with her earlier this week. But he said it “did little to dispel my concerns as to whether she will adhere to the framer’s intent of the Constitution.”

The second-term senator said he found a “history of political activism” in his own review of Kagan’s writings as both a clerk for Justice Thurgood Marshall and an adviser to President Bill Clinton.

“Ms. Kagan’s lack of support for the United States military, demonstrated hostility toward the Second Amendment and her propensity toward political activism signaled to me that her role on the court would be one of liberal judicial activism,” he said.

So far, only three Republican senators have said they will vote for Kagan — Richard Lugar of Indiana, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Susan Collins of Maine.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., supports her.
Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
ChanceWPT
|
July 24, 2010
The only people who think Kagan will NOT be anti-Constitutional and uber-liberal in her views are those who are happy with the likes of Sotomayor who told Congress what she knew they wanted to hear and has already shown just how far left she is. Needless to say she hasn’t voted the way she indicated to a complicit Congress that she would. Kagan would be just more of the same, and Actions always speak louder than words.

The fact that those three Republicans (who have repeatedly proven they are Republicans in name only) is yet further confirmation of why the American people need to wake up and make sure to vote in our national AND regional politics!

Dado36
|
July 24, 2010
Question: "How can a person, who broke ethical laws; bond of marriage and paying a cover up; how can that person dare to issue a judgment of another one, that for all what I could see is not at fault. Do ethics count anything Mr. Ensign?"
SSNV
|
July 23, 2010
Of course he will vote NO the only real news is if he will ever vote yes...

report abuse...

We consider the comments section of www.dailysparkstribune.com to be a key part of a constructive community dialogue. Your comments will appear as you type them. The Daily Sparks Tribune does not prescreen contributions to the comments section. Individuals posting libelous statements may be held responsible.